Skip to content
City PM
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Opinion
Monday 08 February 2016 4:37 pm

UK Waspi pensions campaign: The government must revisit changes to the state pension age that disadvantage women

By: Jessica Morris

Add as a preferred source on Google

We in the SNP are not against equalisation of the state pension age; that’s not why we support the Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi) campaign.

It's perfectly fair for men and women to retire at the same age. However, the pace of the process and the lack of transitional arrangements make up the real issue here.

To illustrate the problem, a woman born on the 10th February 1950 achieved pensionable age on 10 Feb 2010, aged 60. A woman born just five years later in 1955 won’t get her pension until 10 February 2012, aged 66 years.

The complex transitional arrangements currently in place mean that someone born on the 10th Feb 1953 got their first pension payment last month, in January 2016, aged 62 years and 10 months – while someone born a year later in 1954 must wait an additional two-and-a-half years until July 2019, aged 65 years and four months.

This can't be right – the pace of change is far too dramatic. Women of this generation had an expectation that, having paid national insurance contributions throughout their working lives, they were entitled to a state pension. The goalposts have not been moved, so much as smashed and broken.

Read more: Minister says women losing out due to state pension age changes should use "other benefits" such as job seekers allowance

We in the SNP believe that government has a responsibility to look after people who have worked and now look forward to retirement. Women who often experienced inequality in pay and opportunities early in their working lives are now to be faced with the prospect of having to wait for something to which they believed they had an unassailable right.

On 7th January , our SNP motion calling on the government to introduce better transitional arrangements for those women negatively affected by the changes was carried in parliament by 158 votes to zero.

But because this was a backbench debate, the decision was non-binding and the government, only a very few of whom actually attended the debate, are not compelled to act on it. What does that say about parliamentary democracy in this country?

One thing is crystal-clear: if we had powers over pensions in Scotland, the Scottish Government would do the right thing for our pensioners. The UK government plough on regardless, ignoring the claims of the Waspi () campaign and neglecting the needs of their people. ​

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • Jobs and Money

Categories

  • Personal Development

Trending Articles

  • Burnham tax plans spark investor rush to bank capital gains

  • Nothing fails to file accounts months after dissolution threat

  • Cruyff turn: Starmer allows pubs to stay open for England World Cup game

  • I’ve taken the best train trips in the world. Here are my 5 favourites

  • PwC joins the Canary Wharf crowd in major property shake-up

More from City PM

  • Burnham hints at payout for Waspi women claiming billions

    Politics
    Burnham smiling broadly at a community event, surrounded by enthusiastic supporters, conveying a sense of positivity and u...
  • Burnham rows back on £10bn Waspi women offer

    Politics
    Andy Burnham discusses support for Waspi women, addressing pension injustice in a public speech.
  • Ask the Expert: Should I go part-time or pay for nursery?

    Personal Finance
    Marianna Hunt discussing financial strategies at a business conference, wearing a professional suit, engaging with the aud...
  • Cliff-edge warning: Fewer than 10 per cent of Brits to achieve a comfortable retirement

    Personal Finance
    Jar filled with coins symbolizing cautious saving habits of older Brits avoiding stock market investments for retirement s...
  • Carrying debt into retirement isn’t always bad news

    Opinion
    Woman and man discussing retirement savings, highlighting gender pension gap and financial planning differences
  • Speed or stability? Bond markets strap in for Andy Burnham coronation

    Economics
    Andy Burnham smiling at a public event, wearing a suit and tie, representing positive leadership and community engagement.
  • Making the jump to self-employment could damage your pension savings

    Personal Finance
    In 2022, rolling Tube strikes led to massive queues for crowded buses. (Photo by Chris J Ratcliffe/Getty Images)
  • Andy Burnham will crumble like a biscuit he can’t even name

    Opinion
    Burnham 1 showcases a bustling cityscape highlighting economic growth and urban development in the region.

City PM — European politics, business and analysis.

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • UK & Ireland

Topics

  • Business
  • Markets
  • AI
  • Technology
  • Opinion
  • Energy

More

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Fintech
  • Legal
  • Sport
  • Life

Company

  • About City PM
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 City PM · Published by CityPM Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
About · Editorial Policy · Corrections · Contact · Privacy