Skip to content
City PM
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • DE
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • DE
Thursday 22 June 2023 1:24 pm  |  Updated:  Thursday 22 June 2023 1:49 pm

‘Totally without merit’: Judge rejects environmental challenge against Sizewell C nuclear plant

By: Nicholas Earl

Add as a preferred source on Google
The government expects to reach a final investment decision on Sizewell C this year
The government expects to reach a final investment decision on Sizewell C this year

The government’s decision to grant development consent for the Sizewell C nuclear plant was lawful, a high court judge today ruled.

Justice Holgate has quashed a protracted legal challenge from localist campaigners on environmental grounds, which he said was, in parts, “totally without merit”.

In a blistering ruling, he knocked back the campaigners’ claims over water supplies and energy policy.

Together Against Sizewell C (TASC)– chiefly consisting of local residents – launched a judicial review on environmental grounds after the government granted development consent to the mooted £20bn-plus project in Suffolk last July.

At a court hearing in March, lawyers for the group argued the government had failed to oversee the potential environmental impact of providing an “essential” water supply for Sizewell C.

They also suggested the government did not consider alternative solutions to meeting its energy and climate change objectives.

The judge said there was “nothing artificial or unlawfully limiting” about a policy aimed at providing a mix of solar, wind and nuclear power.

The government countered that it made “legitimate planning judgments” for Sizewell C’s development.

Now, Justice Holgate has dismissed the campaigner’s challenge and said several parts of its argument were “totally without merit”.

He determined the government’s approach to the water supply, which would be dealt with under a separate process, was lawful.

He said: “The claimant’s argument depends upon an illegitimate attempt to rewrite the government’s policy aims by pretending that the central policy objective is at a higher level of abstraction, namely to produce clean energy, without any regard to diversity of energy sources and security of supply.

Read more

Gatwick expansion cleared for take-off, court rules

20m passengers have flown through Gatwick this year

“But it is not the role of a claimant, or the court, to rewrite government policy, or to airbrush objectives of that policy which are plainly of ‘central’ or ‘core’ or ‘essential’ importance.”

Following the verdict, TASC was ordered to pay £10,000 towards government costs.

Sizewell C is a proposed 3.2GW nuclear power plant overseen by French energy giant EDF, which holds a 50 per cent stake matched by the government, which has already backed the project with a £700m stake.

The design is near identical to under-construction Hinkley Point C and is expected to generate low-carbon electricity to supply 6m homes.

It is a vital cog in the government’s nuclear ambitions, as it looks to bolster its ageing fleet and ramp up generation to 24GW.

The decision paves the way for Sizewell C’s construction, with no government and legislative hurdles remaining.

Instead, its now a matter of securing financing, and whether EDF will go forward with an FID.

TASC told City PM it remains “resolute” in the determination to fight the “monstrous Sizewell C development” despite the judicial review verdict.

Chairperson, Jenny Kirtley, said ‘Naturally, TASC is disappointed, but this verdict does not signal the end of our efforts. The Suffolk Heritage Coast cannot be sacrificed for such an unnecessary and inappropriate development, and we will examine every avenue of opposition until all are exhausted’.

The government, Sizewell C and EDF have been approached for comment.

Read more

X-energy Submits Xe-100 HTGR for UK Generic Design Assessment

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • News

Categories

  • Energy

Related Topics

  • Energy
  • Hinkley Point C nuclear power station
  • nuclear power

Trending Articles

  • Burnham tax plans spark investor rush to bank capital gains

  • Nothing fails to file accounts months after dissolution threat

  • I’ve taken the best train trips in the world. Here are my 5 favourites

  • Cruyff turn: Starmer allows pubs to stay open for England World Cup game

  • Nottingham Forest owner Marinakis announces £210m stadium plans

More from City PM

  • Gatwick expansion cleared for take-off, court rules

    Aviation
    20m passengers have flown through Gatwick this year
  • X-energy Submits Xe-100 HTGR for UK Generic Design Assessment

    Business Wire
  • Steel tariffs watered down after industry backlash

    Industrials
    Britains steel industry facing challenges with potential shutdowns and job losses, highlighting economic impact.
  • Uranium miner plots London float as father-and-son team reopen abandoned site in northern Italy

    Mining
  • Flocean Produces First Drinkable Water from Commercial-Scale Subsea Desalination Plant

    Business Wire
  • Judge rejects Gatwick Airport bid to block new relaxed runway slot rules

    Legal
    Gatwick Airport terminal bustling with travelers and staff under bright signage and flight information displays
  • Rolls-Royce shares surge as SMR unit bags multi-billion pound Swedish nuclear contract

    Energy
    Rendering of a small modular reactor (SMR) design showcasing compact and efficient nuclear energy solution
  • The Debate: Should we build a data centre on Brick Lane?

    Opinion
    Protesters rally at Brick Lane holding signs to oppose a data centre development plan, highlighting community concerns.

City PM — European politics, business and analysis.

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • UK & Ireland

Topics

  • Business
  • Markets
  • AI
  • Technology
  • Opinion
  • Energy

More

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Fintech
  • Legal
  • Sport
  • Life

Company

  • About City PM
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 City PM · Published by CityPM Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
About · Editorial Policy · Corrections · Contact · Privacy