Reeves to hold talks with US as Trump says ‘no rush’ to strike deals
Rachel Reeves has said she will hold talks with the White House next week amid efforts to strike a UK-US trade deal, despite Donald Trump downplaying the likelihood of any imminent agreements.
Britain hopes a deal can help soften the brunt of the US president’s sweeping 10 per cent tariffs on all goods imported to America, with the Telegraph reporting that officials in Washington believe an agreement could be weeks away.
The Chancellor, who will be in the US next week for meetings, said “active negotiations” with the Americans are still ongoing.
Asked whether the UK is within three weeks of a deal the Chancellor told broadcasters on Thursday: “Those conversations with our US counterparts are ongoing.
“I will be in Washington next week for the International Monetary Fund annual meetings, their spring meetings.
“I will also be having conversations with the US administration whilst I’m there.
“The key thing for the British Government is always acting in the UK’s national interest, and any deal that’s able to be secured will always have front-and-centre British national interest.”
However, in remarks made on Thursday, the US president said he was in “no rush” to reach any deals because of the revenues his new tariffs are generating.
Mr Trump said lots of countries wanted to reach deals “frankly… more than I do,” and that any agreements would come “at a certain point”.
But he suggested while meeting with Italian premier Giorgia Meloni that it would be easy to find an agreement with the European Union and others.
“We’re in no rush,” Mr Trump said.
A 10% tariff on imports of UK goods into the US was imposed earlier this month, alongside a 25% levy on car imports.
Meanwhile, the US president suggested that a date for September was being set for him to visit the King in Britain.
Mr Trump, a known admirer of the royal family, had been handed a personal invitation from Charles for an “unprecedented” second state visit by Sir Keir Starmer during the Prime Minister’s visit to Washington.
However, the Telegraph reported that instead of meeting at Balmoral or Dumfries House, as previously thought, the US leader will instead be hosted at Windsor Castle.
Ms Reeves was speaking from Scunthorpe after the Government intervened last weekend to support the steelworks.
Asked whether any deal could see the 10 per cent levy lifted, she said: “We are in active negotiations at the moment with our US counterparts on a whole range of issues concerning the tariffs for steel and aluminium, and the cars which of course are at 25 per cent, as well as the headline tariff rate of 10 per cent.”
She added: “Getting a deal across a whole range of areas… (is) very important for British industry and British jobs, and that is my focus as Chancellor.”
It comes as a former spy chief warned that the UK “would be in trouble” if it was to agree a trade deal with the US at the expense of China.
Nigel Inkster, the former deputy head of MI6 said a US-UK deal could negatively impact Britain’s relationship with China, which is a “critical supplier” of pharmaceuticals in both the UK and the US.
Mr Inkster told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “If it were the case that we had such a deal, I think it would come with strings, and one of those strings would be an expectation that the UK would get with the programme when it came to China.
“We’ve seen a precursor of this with the Huawei 5G saga, which the Americans said, you cannot use a Chinese company to build the 5G.
“What needs to happen is that the Government needs to look much more carefully at what constitutes critical national infrastructure, and consider what the risks are in any given sector.
“And one of the areas here that worries me quite a lot is the whole pharmaceutical sector, because China is a critical supplier of many pharmaceutical products. Without them, we would be in trouble.”
Pharmaceuticals are said to be a heated part of discussions between British and US negotiators, amid Mr Trump’s plans to begin imposing tariffs on medicines.
Asked if the Chinese government could switch off the supply of vital pharmaceuticals in case of a future dispute, Mr Inkster said: “It would be an incredibly powerful lever.
“China has, I think, a fairly clear track record of readiness to use economic coercion.”
Press Association