Skip to content
Wednesday 29 July 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE
City PM

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,871.02
+0.83%
DAX
25,464.01
0.00%
CAC 40
8,458.78
0.00%
STOXX 50
6,289.51
0.00%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceBankingAIEnergyFintechPropertyCapital Markets
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Wednesday 30 May 2012 7:06 pm  |  Updated:  Thursday 30 May 2019 4:24 am

Legal considerations for off-site storage

By: KCS-content

Add as a preferred source on Google

IN traditional outsourcing, when an activity is transferred by an outsourcer to a service provider, the outsourcer may retain regulatory compliance responsibility. Cloud computing is a new form of outsourcing and many traditional outsourcing concerns and issues apply equally. Compliance responsibility remains unaffected: you can outsource the fulfillment of the regulatory requirement, but you cannot outsource your regulatory status. As such, the regulation of cloud computing is a paradox: cloud computing is regulated, but there is no entity to be regulated – rather, normal rules apply to a new business model for ICT delivery and consumption.

Cloud for financial companies is no more complicated than for any other organisation. Normal considerations apply: what solution is appropriate; what data goes into the cloud; which processes? The wrinkles start to appear when a financial organisation is thinking about placing key client data offshore and/or putting key processes into the cloud.

It would be wrong to say that the cloud is specifically regulated. But it would also be wrong to say that it is not regulated at all. In fact, there is a whole host of law and regulation that underpins online and cloud activities. Some of the most relevant regulatory regimes are noteworthy because they typify the concerns of organisations seeking to embrace utility computing.

There are three key considerations for financial companies looking to outsource to the cloud.

The first is reliant upon the identification of critical or important functions performed by an outsourcing company on behalf of a financial company. It is imperative that any regulatory demands on a business are met by outsourcers and that there are contractual provisions for this. Terms like this are normal for a full-blown outsourcing arrangement, but onerous if compared to a normal cloud vendor’s terms.

The second key consideration is whether a financial organisation will be putting data into the cloud and the security issues there are with this – what some might say is the Achilles heel of cloud computing. This is a particularly important consideration when dealing with personal and sensitive data. There are obligations under the Data Protection Act that need to be met. First assess the nature of the data and its sensitivity and second, consider the public perception of this being stored in the cloud.

Lastly, there is the issue of exactly where the data might be going. A benefit of cloud computing is that data is held elsewhere – typically in a cheaper jurisdiction. This may raise no issues at all for raw, non-personal data. But the EU Data Protection Directive requires that personal data is not transferred to a country or territory outside of the European Economic Area unless that country or territory ensures an adequate level of protection for that data.

To successfully pick your way through the relevant regulation it is first critical to understand the business need, the available technology, the relevant data and the terms and conditions upon which the cloud offering can be secured. Blending together those considerations will allow customers and cloud vendors to achieve a community of interest, in a regulatory compliant way.

Mark O’Conor is partner and London location head for IPT at DLA Piper.

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • Jobs and Money

Categories

  • Money

Related Topics

  • NULL

Trending Articles

  • Big Four’s AIM exodus accelerates as mid-tier firms seize mandates

  • FTSE 100 firm agrees £5.7bn takeover in latest private equity swoop

  • EY and London managing partner fined over £1.3m for audit failure

  • Burnham backs plan to pump £1bn pension funds into start-ups

  • As it happened: Stocks jump as oil drops; Unilever shares soar on decade-best sales

More from City PM

  • Wasabi and Megaport Partner to Advance the Next Generation of AI and Cloud Infrastructure

    Business Wire
  • U.K. Firms Move to AI-Native, Sovereign Cloud Infrastructure

    Business Wire
  • Monzo founder joins Anthropic as AI talent race heats up

    Tech
    Claude AI interface showcasing advanced features in a business setting
  • AI spending overshadows Alphabet and Tesla earnings

    Tech
    The Competition and Markets Authority said they've heard complaints Google's search advertising costs are higher than expected
  • Vultr and SUSE Launch Validated Full-Stack NVIDIA Enterprise AI Platform to Accelerate Production Deployments

    Business Wire
  • New Victoria Hospital Goes Live with MEDITECH Expanse to Deliver New Era of Care

    Business Wire
  • New Smarsh Research Finds Enterprises Are Deploying AI Faster Than They Can Govern It

    Business Wire
  • Comsysto Reply Supports Audi in Evolving Its B2B Used Car Platform With an AI-Based Multi-Agent System

    Business Wire
CityPM

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • UK & Ireland

Business

  • Markets
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Energy
  • Property
  • Fintech

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About City PM
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 City PM Ltd · Published by CityPM Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook