Skip to content
City PM
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • DE
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • DE
Tuesday 30 January 2024 4:33 pm  |  Updated:  Tuesday 30 January 2024 4:34 pm

Lawyers question benefit of plan to bring back Employment Tribunal fees

By: Maria Ward-Brennan

Professional Services Editor

Add as a preferred source on Google
MoJ launches a consultation to make it easier for organisations to say sorry

Lawyers have questioned the benefit of a government plan to reintroduce Employment Tribunal fees almost seven years after the Supreme Court declared they were unlawful.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) published the proposals late Monday saying that it wanted to reduce the cost for the taxpayer.

The MoJ said that since charging fees were ruled unlawful back in 2017, when fees could add up to over £1000, the number of Employment Tribunal cases has nearly doubled, rising from around 18,000 to about 33,000 cases in 2022/23. This has meant the annual cost of covering the Employment Tribunal, and any related appeals, has risen to around £80m.

The department said it has “carefully considered” the Supreme Court ruling and “has endeavoured to ensure that the fees proposed in this consultation are proportionate and affordable.”

It is proposing a £55 fee that is payable by the claimant on bringing a case to the Tribunal. It is also considering a £55 fee for filing an appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), with the same fee being levied for each judgment, decision, direction or order given by the EAT.

A ‘Help with Fees’ scheme to cover or support people who cannot afford to pay the new fees, has also been proposed.

But lawyers have questioned the benefit of the government’s plan.

Read more

From bathroom to courtroom: Lush chief’s squabble set to fizz in £6m trial

GettyImages 2245687120 showcasing a business professional in a modern office setting, conveying a sense of productivity an...

Law Society of England and Wales president Nick Emmerson said in a statement that the previous fee regime “had a chilling effect on access to justice”.

“We will closely consider the Ministry of Justice’s new proposals to see if they are compatible with all workers being able to enforce their rights,” Emmerson added.

Jo Mackie, head of employment at Lawrence Stephens, said the decision to resurrect Employment Tribunal fees “is likely to be ruled unlawful, as they have been previously.”

“It would be a regressive step to reintroduce these fees, as they stifle fundamental access to justice at a time when claimants are often redundant,” she added.

Martin Pratt, an employment lawyer at RWK Goodman, said: “While it is good that the government has acknowledged that the prior excessive tribunal fees of up to £1,200 did not strike the right balance, I don’t think that the tiny dent of £1.3m-£1.7m that the new, much reduced, £55 fees will make in the £80m annual cost of the Employment Tribunals make the exercise worthwhile.”

“Given that low paid workers, who need it the most, may still be priced out of the process, it’s hard to see what benefit these charges will bring,” he added.

The consultation on the plans will close on March 25.

Read more

UK ‘no longer a serious place’ says Hedge fund boss after losing £200m tax battle

Supreme Court building under clear sky, symbolizing justice and authority, relevant to recent judicial news coverage

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • News

Categories

  • Politics
  • Business
  • Legal

Trending Articles

  • James Watt offers to buy back Brewdog

  • Citroën 2CV returns as a £13,000 electric car, and the timing is no accident

  • Brewdog owner shrugs off James Watt takeover bid

  • Motsepe backed to succeed Fifa’s Infantino by South African minister

  • UK’s biggest pub firm probed over treatment of tenants

More from City PM

  • From bathroom to courtroom: Lush chief’s squabble set to fizz in £6m trial

    Legal
    GettyImages 2245687120 showcasing a business professional in a modern office setting, conveying a sense of productivity an...
  • UK ‘no longer a serious place’ says Hedge fund boss after losing £200m tax battle

    Tax
    Supreme Court building under clear sky, symbolizing justice and authority, relevant to recent judicial news coverage
  • LLPs remain under watchful eye – especially from the taxman

    Legal
    Tax documents and calculator on a desk, symbolizing financial planning and tax preparation for businesses and individuals.
  • Ex-Lush chief’s lawyers hike costs to ensure their AI model isn’t trained by juniors

    Legal
    Law firms are increasingly deploying AI
  • City watchdog suspends parts of £9bn motor finance scheme after industry backlash

    Banking
    The FCA has appointed Liam Coleman interim chair of the FOS.
  • Specialist tech recruiter sees hiring slump across UK and Europe

    Tech
    Skyline of Canada financial district with modern skyscrapers and historic landmarks under a clear blue sky
  • Two solicitors linked to Post Office scandal charged with misconduct

    Legal
    One contract was even an extension of the Horizon deal with the Post Office itself, worth £63m.
  • Starmer’s final act will expose firms to more bogus equality claims

    Opinion
    Business conference attendees networking at a corporate event with banners and presentation screens in the background

City PM — European politics, business and analysis.

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • UK & Ireland

Topics

  • Business
  • Markets
  • AI
  • Technology
  • Opinion
  • Energy

More

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Fintech
  • Legal
  • Sport
  • Life

Company

  • About City PM
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 City PM · Published by CityPM Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
About · Editorial Policy · Corrections · Contact · Privacy · Facebook