Skip to content
Monday 3 August 2026London --:--Frankfurt --:--Zurich --:--
NewslettersSearchEN · DE
City PM

European business, markets and politics

FTSE 100
10,868.05
-0.27%
DAX
25,629.24
+0.07%
CAC 40
8,509.64
+0.28%
STOXX 50
6,358.01
+0.21%
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
More
GermanyFranceBankingAIEnergyFintechPropertyCapital Markets
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Technology
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • DE
Friday 29 November 2019 5:22 pm

Labour’s manifesto could break the fabric of the UK economy

By: Ewen Stewart

Add as a preferred source on Google
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn was grilled on the Labour manifesto by Andrew Neil
Jeremy Corbyn was grilled on the Labour manifesto by Andrew Neil

Labour’s manifesto would completely break the fabric of Britain’s liberal and tolerant free market economy, replacing it with a command and control centralising experiment that would do untold damage to the very people Labour claim to support.

Let’s be clear; this is not a normal Labour manifesto. This Labour manifesto would uproot society to the detriment of rich and poor.

Read more: Labour and Conservatives already on track to break spending rules

Labour is right about one thing – the so-called rich (defined by them as earning over £80,000) would be hit hard while those who are actually rich and already pay 28 per cent of all the tax ( the top 1 per cent of earners) would, in numbers, leave the country, rendering their policies totally counter-productive.

Where Labour are 100 per cent wrong is that ‘the many’ would soon see their pensions, NHS and education crumble as capital fled the country and tax receipts withered.

Let’s make no mistake. This election will define whether Britain remains a liberal, tolerant free market open economy or moves towards a command, retributive and increasingly politically arbitrary country where investment, opportunity and jobs collapse.

The scale of Labour’s proposals are staggering. The headline £83bn, or 4 per cent of GDP, works out at an addition £2,515 of tax for each and every employee, but it is the scale of the detail that compounds this unprecedented largesse.

Over a decade Labour propose a £400bn ‘National Transformation Fund’, of which £250bn will be earmarked for a new Green Transformation Fund. Then there is the £250bn ‘National Investment Bank’ with a network of regional banks directly lending into ‘infrastructure and innovation’. Sounds great but such centralised direction of capital is not the role of the state. Such policies were tried to much smaller effect in the 1970s with disastrous consequences.

If this was not enough a £140bn Social Transformation Fund would direct investment in key infrastructure. Of course all this is before the potentially £200bn cost of nationalising water, rail, post and taxpayer-funded broadband.

Read more

Burnham risks ‘breaking manifesto’ without business rates reform

Andy Burnham speaking at a public event, addressing the audience with a focused expression, highlighting his leadership role.

Add that little lot up and we find additional commitments of close to £2 trillion over a decade or around £54,000 for each and every employee in the country. It is simply not credible.

What is clear is Labour wants to direct and control this investment in a highly centralised top-down fashion. This is the opposite to what should happen in a liberal economy with a myriad of micro individual and business bottom-up decisions based on the free market. Labour’s ideas are a recipe for waste, inefficiency and declining productivity.

Britain’s accumulated debt is currently £1.8 trillion, or 84 per cent of GDP, which is what many economists consider is close to a safe maximum. The deficit has, despite the disastrous position the Conservatives inherited from Labour, been brought slowly but surely under control.

Read more: IFS blasts both Tories’ and Labour’s spending plans

To increase spending even remotely on the scale proposed by Labour will cause immense capital flight and be counter-productive. Britain is currently an open economy and frankly individuals and business invested here because they viewed the UK as a safe haven in a dangerous world, with the rule of law, stable taxes, strong cultural assets and because, property rights were secure. Labour’s prospectus breaks that covenant.

Capital and talent will leave instantly if this Labour prospectus comes anywhere near happening. There is no example of any liberal, open western democracy that has adopted such a centralised command and control and frankly illiberal regime. None. We have to look to Latin America with Argentina being the closest analogy.

Soft words Mr Corbyn but your actions will do untold harm. You are honest enough to say you will harm the rich. But alas you will harm the poor too and cause immense social discord in the process.

Prosperity cannot be taken for granted, it is a fragile flower. Argentina, one of the richest nations on earth before the First World War now languishes. If Corbyn wins he will start the process of sending this great nation on the road to Argentina.

Read more

Tax rises ‘guaranteed’ as Healey faces £22bn black hole from Burnham spending plans

Chancellor John Healey smiling, wearing a navy suit, white shirt, and red tie.

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • Markets & Economics
  • News
  • Opinion

Categories

  • Economics
  • Opinion
  • Politics

Related Topics

  • General election 2019

Trending Articles

  • Gino D’Acampo restaurants face HMRC winding-up order

  • BP quits North Sea after tax grab

  • Goldman Sachs criticises £1.45m paternity payout

  • Healey announces early Budget

  • Revolut will become $1 trillion company by 2035, says early VC backer

More from City PM

  • Burnham risks ‘breaking manifesto’ without business rates reform

    Retail
    Andy Burnham speaking at a public event, addressing the audience with a focused expression, highlighting his leadership role.
  • Tax rises ‘guaranteed’ as Healey faces £22bn black hole from Burnham spending plans

    Economics
    Chancellor John Healey smiling, wearing a navy suit, white shirt, and red tie.
  • Tax online businesses more to save Britain’s struggling high streets

    Opinion
    Bustling Oxford Street with shoppers, iconic red buses, and storefronts under a clear sky in a vibrant urban scene
  • Voters expect Burnham to hike taxes

    Politics
    Andy Burnham discussing capital gains tax increase during a press conference, highlighting potential economic impacts
  • On this day: the birth of Michael Foot

    Opinion
    Michael Foot speaking at a public rally in a city square with a large crowd and buildings in the background.
  • OECD sounds alarm on pension triple lock in challenge to Burnham

    Economics
    Andy Burnham discussing AI advancements at a business conference podium with delegates in the background
  • The City will bid good riddance to Rachel Reeves

    Opinion
    Reeves Bank exterior with modern architecture, showcasing its sleek design and prominent logo on a sunny day.
  • The Debate: should Andy Burnham have made a woman his Chancellor?

    Opinion
    Rachel Reeves delivering a speech at a press event, wearing a navy blazer and standing in front of a backdrop with logos.
CityPM

Independent European business, markets and political news for decision-makers.

Morning Briefing

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • UK & Ireland

Business

  • Markets
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Energy
  • Property
  • Fintech

Editorial

  • Opinion
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact

Company

  • About City PM
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 City PM Ltd · Published by CityPM Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
Privacy · Terms · Cookies · Facebook