Skip to content
City PM
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • DE
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • DE
City PM’s journalism is supported by our readers. .
Wednesday 27 April 2016 4:59 am  |  Updated:  Monday 02 August 2021 5:48 pm

Hidden fees are a stealth tax on all our savings: This is no free market

By: City PM Contributor

Add as a preferred source on Google

Do you know how much your pension costs? How much the folk looking after your money are charging you? No? It’s not easy to find out. I didn’t until I demanded the information. It wasn’t just the management fee they’d advertised but many times that. Small percentages that really added up.

I became suspicious when I received an annual report which didn’t list the transaction charges. I knew there had been a few in recent months but none of the fees were stated. I asked what they, and other charges, added up to. “Very difficult to say,” I was told. Of course it is. Transaction costs, ongoing charges, management fees and, when you decide you need the money, exit costs are all hidden. It was only when I said I would use the Freedom of Information Act to demand an answer that one came.

The details were staggering – more than three times the advertised charge was going in other fees, all taken from the fund directly and not listed in an annual report, so not easy to spot. This isn’t fair. For pension managers, it’s not just market movements that matter: churn (the buying and selling of funds or shares) can make a tidy profit by adding cost to the investor. Each trade often costs at least £10 with, of course, a percentage on top.

I’m a Conservative. That’s why I believe in free markets and competition. I have no problem with companies offering different services and being paid for it. But what we’re seeing in the investment industry isn’t a free market. Hidden fees make proper comparison, and therefore competition, impossible.

That’s not right. Today, billions of pounds every year are invested by people across our country. Even more will rightly be using the new Isas in coming years. They’re an important change to ensure more people save and our society is better prepared for the future. But these hidden fees mean that, whatever we put aside, the home we’re saving for will be smaller, the holiday shorter or the retirement will come later.

If you haven’t any savings, you may not think these hidden fees affect you. Think again. Auto-enrolment means you will soon have a pension. It’s great that everyone will be saving for retirement and, with annual management charges capped, they’ll be cheaper than many private pensions, but the temptation to use other fees within funds will be great. That’s why full disclosure matters for the billions of pounds in private pensions today, and tomorrow’s auto-enrolment.

Because scalping is growing. Top wealth managers have boosted their income by 7 per cent in the past year despite selling almost half as many new funds. And more than half their income now comes from ongoing fees. That’s up from a third last year. While we’re dependent on a growing economy, they’re not. Their profit comes from us not noticing what we pay.

These fees add up. Initial set-up costs of 2-3 per cent, an annual management charge of 2 per cent, and an exit fee of perhaps 5 per cent are not unusual in Isas or private pensions (auto-enrolment is capped at 0.75 per cent) and those costs can shrink savings by a third over a lifetime. And that’s based on 7 per cent annual growth – pretty good today. Think about that. Your pension could be a third smaller just because you didn’t notice a few per cent a year.

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) should change the rules. Today, it requires pension providers to publish an annual statement updating projected savings, net of charges. The charges should also be listed alongside the cumulative impact they will have. That would allow people to know what they were choosing. And it should apply to all savings.

Back in 2013, the Office of Fair Trading said there was “insufficient transparency and comparability of charges” in the pension market. It said providers weren’t including costs and charges within the annual management charges they quote in a consistent way so we can’t compare like with like. That hasn’t changed.

That’s why we’ve got to change the system.

Fund managers should have a legal duty to be open with their clients. That would end the culture that sees hidden fees as better than advertised costs and, with auto-enrolment pensions, enable easier switching. We need the Advertising Standards Agency, the DWP and the industry to work together. Perhaps then we would see an end to ongoing charges, exit fees and the many other stealth taxes imposed on our savings. In the long term, we’d all be better off.

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • Jobs and Money
  • Opinion

Categories

  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Personal Finance

Trending Articles

  • Exclusive: Big Four giant KPMG to cut more jobs

  • Music tycoon Simon Cowell sued by prominent City lawyer

  • The former African gold miner taking on the billionaire Issa brothers

  • Tesco ‘in talks’ to exit eastern Europe

  • Easyjet agrees to £5.7bn Apollo takeover

More from City PM

  • Ticket reseller StubHub UK fined nearly £1m for hiding fees

    Retail
    Aerial view of Glastonbury Festival showcasing vibrant crowds, colorful tents, and iconic Pyramid Stage under clear skies
  • ‘Bogus claim’: Ryanair hits back at watchdog probe into family seating policy

    Transport & Infrastructure
    Elon Musk and Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary face off amid acquisition rumors in a business meeting setting
  • Over a Quarter of UK Employees Admit to Using AI to Generate or Manipulate Expense Receipts to Top Up Their Salary

    Business Wire
  • Finimize data: Fees alone won’t win UK retail investors

    Business Wire
  • Ask the Expert: Should I go part-time or pay for nursery?

    Personal Finance
    Marianna Hunt discussing financial strategies at a business conference, wearing a professional suit, engaging with the aud...
  • Ex-Lush chief’s lawyers hike costs to ensure their AI model isn’t trained by juniors

    Legal
    Law firms are increasingly deploying AI
  • Starmer weighs cut to EU student fees in bid for Brexit reset

    Politics
    Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaks at a press conference addressing future leadership rumours, wearing a navy suit and tie.
  • FCA charges City lawyer with insider dealing over maternity brand acquisition

    Legal
    The FCA said in June any scheme must keep the market afloat in order to curb rising costs for consumers.

City PM — European politics, business and analysis.

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • UK & Ireland

Topics

  • Business
  • Markets
  • AI
  • Technology
  • Opinion
  • Energy

More

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Fintech
  • Legal
  • Sport
  • Life

Company

  • About City PM
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 City PM · Published by CityPM Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
About · Editorial Policy · Corrections · Contact · Privacy · Facebook