Skip to content
City PM
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Opinion
Wednesday 07 October 2020 11:17 am  |  Updated:  Wednesday 07 October 2020 11:18 am

G4S hits back at Gardaworld over ‘misleading’ pension scheme claims

By: Edward Thicknesse

Add as a preferred source on Google
G4S
G4S

Outsourcing giant G4S has hit back at Gardaworld after the Canadian firm stepped up its attempts to take over its larger rival.

In a statement this morning, the FTSE 250 firm blasted the company over claims it made regarding the viability of G4S’ pension schemes.

Having had multiple offers to take over the firm rejected so far, yesterday Gardaworld said that it would begin meeting with key G4S stakeholders this week.

It said that the firm’s “own missteps” had been the reason for the collapse in G4S’ share price, and also said that there were “serious issues” with its pension scheme.

This morning G4S responded in kind, reiterating its rejection of Gardaworld’s 190p per share offer and questioning the security firm’s track record.

“Gardaworld’s record is one of a loss-making company which has reported net losses attributable to shareholders of $940m (£727.3m) in the past three years and it lacks the geographic coverage to be a truly global company. 

“Gardaworld clearly needs a transformative acquisition in order to realise its aspiration to be a global company and this is simply not reflected in its offer of 190 pence per share”, it said.

The company added that statements about its pension schemes were “misleading”, saying it was both “well funded” and “well managed”, and that it had already agreed a funding plan with its trustees.

Read more

Pension funds must ’embrace’ private markets to fuel growth

Skyline of Canada with iconic financial district buildings, highlighting UK investments and economic growth.

It concluded: “When assessing the value of G4S, what matters is the strength of the company’s current position, performance and its future prospects. The Board remains of the view that the Gardaworld offer of 190 pence per share significantly undervalues G4S and its prospects.”

Gardaworld said that it made the offer on an assessment of “the many immediate and longer term risks that are attached to the G4S business”.

In response to G4S’ comments, a spokesperson for Gardaworld said: “We said we would help shareholders ‘look under the hood’ and that is exactly what we will continue to do.

“G4S doesn’t appear to be enjoying the scrutiny. As we expect to demonstrate, the future for an independent G4S is not at all as the seven-year incumbent management team are painting it.” 

G4S’ shares slipped into the red this morning, but are still trading at 201.20p.

Gardaworld’s relentless pursuit of G4S has seen it have two offers rejected already. In June, it first bid at 145p per share and then followed up with an improved 153p per share offer.

The firm is the largest privately owned security services firm in the world, and employs more than 102,000 people globally.

The firm, which is 51 per cent owned by private equity fund BC Partners, has repeatedly urged G4S shareholders to ask the board to enter into negotiations over a potential deal. 

Read more

Government sets out conditions for unlocking ‘trapped capital’ in defined benefit pension schemes

Dominic Cummings claims China has stolen vast amounts of secret UK material

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • News

Categories

  • Business

Related Topics

  • G4S

Trending Articles

  • Top Burnham adviser calls for capital gains and inheritance tax hikes

  • A meeting with the breakfast king of Mayfair

  • Housebuilding giants hit with £4.5bn lawsuit for allegedly overcharging buyers

  • As it happened: Stocks jump on defence and metals boost; Oil on track to shed a fifth on US-Iran peace hopes

  • BT tops FTSE 100 after finding new home for international business with Verizon joint venture

More from City PM

  • Pension funds must ’embrace’ private markets to fuel growth

    Investing
    Skyline of Canada with iconic financial district buildings, highlighting UK investments and economic growth.
  • Government sets out conditions for unlocking ‘trapped capital’ in defined benefit pension schemes

    Personal Finance
    Dominic Cummings claims China has stolen vast amounts of secret UK material
  • Burnham hints at payout for Waspi women claiming billions

    Politics
    Burnham smiling broadly at a community event, surrounded by enthusiastic supporters, conveying a sense of positivity and u...
  • Moving abroad won’t save you from the British tax man

    Personal Finance
    Person paying taxes online on a laptop at a beach, illustrating UK tax obligations despite living abroad
  • City sounds the alarm on pension inheritance tax upheaval

    Personal Finance
    HMRC
  • Making the jump to self-employment could damage your pension savings

    Personal Finance
    In 2022, rolling Tube strikes led to massive queues for crowded buses. (Photo by Chris J Ratcliffe/Getty Images)
  • Pension master trusts join forces to tackle outdated transfer systems

    Personal Finance
    Modern laptops and desktop computers arranged on a sleek workspace, highlighting latest tech trends in digital devices.
  • ‘It’s important we increase spending’: Treasury minister defends triple lock pension

    Politics
    Treasury team members discuss financial strategies at a business meeting, showcasing collaborative efforts in economic pla...

City PM — European politics, business and analysis.

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • UK & Ireland

Topics

  • Business
  • Markets
  • AI
  • Technology
  • Opinion
  • Energy

More

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Fintech
  • Legal
  • Sport
  • Life

Company

  • About City PM
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 City PM · Published by CityPM Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
About · Editorial Policy · Corrections · Contact · Privacy