Skip to content
City PM
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • Markets
  • Business
  • Opinion
Friday 05 August 2016 10:02 am

Should Philip Hammond call an early Autumn Statement?

By: Jake Cordell

Add as a preferred source on Google

The mighty economic salvo unleashed by the Bank of England yesterday has heaped pressure onto the government to pull its weight in supporting the UK economy in the wake of the Brexit vote.

Mark Carney, George Osborne, the Labour Party and a host of analysts and businesses called on the chancellor Philip Hammond to step up to the plate with his own stimulus package, with many demanding action over the summer, rather than waiting until the traditional autumn statement.

Read more: Should the UK cut VAT to prop up the UK economy?

The governor said that while the Bank of England could “ease the adjustment” into a new post-referendum economic order, it was “not the gift of monetary policymakers” to determine how that should look and feel.

“Monetary policy is more nimble, and it is appropriate to be the first responder to a shock,” Carney said. “[But] the biggest elements of the change are structural. Monetary policy can take those into account, but it can’t really do anything about those structural factors.”

Controversially, the former occupier of Number 11, George Osborne, did not hold back yesterday as he outlined the steps he would be taking if he still held the keys.​

The Bank of England's Brexit response

  • Interest rates cut to all-time low of 0.25 per cent
  • £60bn government-bond buying programme
  • New £10bn corporate-bond buying programme
  • New scheme to pump £100bn of new cash to the banks to offer cheap loans

Osborne said on Twitter the Bank was “right to use the triple whammy of lower official rates, quantitative easing and funding scheme to support demand.

“But [this] is only a temporary answer … [it] must be matched by permanent supply side reform: lower business taxes, free trade with EU and unambiguous message we’re open to overseas investment.”

Former rate-setter Andrew Sentance of PwC agreed, saying the current situation "requires a political response from the government", while KPMG's Yael Selfin urged the "government to pick up the baton and provide the more substantive support the UK economy needs”.

Read more: What does Brexit mean for the public finances?

The Centre for Economic and Business Research (CEBR) said waiting until the official autumn statement for new policies “could make recession inevitable” and business groups including the CBI, the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC), the Institute of Directors (IoD) and the manufacturers’ organisation the EEF, have all called for a robust government response to the economic shock.

Shadow chancellor John McDonnell wants the government to spend at least £500bn on a infrastructure projects.

How late can it wait?

The term 'autumn' statement has been used a little loosely in recent years.

  • 2015: 25 November
  • 2014: 3 December
  • 2013: 5 December
  • 2012: 5 December
  • 2011: 29 November

Despite his pledge to take “any necessary steps”, Hammond appears reluctant to shake up the parliamentary calendar. He said yesterday: “As we approach the autumn statement of course we will consider whether there is any need for a fiscal response.”

This worries some since the statement has fallen as late as December in recent years. The date for this year's has yet to be set.

To call or not to call?

Tim Bale, professor of politics at Queen Mary University said he could see why Hammond might not want to make such a dramatic move as calling an early autumn statement.

"The government is in the position of playing for time," he told City PM "They don't really know what they are dealing with, but you have to assume behind the scenes they are burning the midnight oil.

"They don't want to give any indication of what's going to go in the autumn statement," until they have a clearer picture of the wider economic response, Bale added.

City view: We need a response, but not a trillion-pound spending spree

Claudia Wood, chief executive of think tank Demos, however, suggested it may have been unwise for MPs to trot off on their usual extended summer holidays while the machinations of Brexit were being played out behind the scenes.

She said: "An appearance of business as usual is important, but probably what should have happened is government stays on a bit longer and MPs come back a bit earlier because there is so much to be decided.

"I'm not sure sticking to the current parliamentary calendar is going to give us enough time to shake out those concerns."

Share this article

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

Similarly tagged content:

Sections

  • Markets & Economics
  • News

Categories

  • Business
  • Economics
  • Politics

Trending Articles

  • Burnham tax plans spark investor rush to bank capital gains

  • Nothing fails to file accounts months after dissolution threat

  • Cruyff turn: Starmer allows pubs to stay open for England World Cup game

  • I’ve taken the best train trips in the world. Here are my 5 favourites

  • PwC joins the Canary Wharf crowd in major property shake-up

More from City PM

  • Bank of England unveils Armageddon stress test scenario ‘more severe than the financial crisis’

    Regulation
    bank of england
  • Kia Oval worth £80m to the UK economy as Test gets underway

    Sport Business
    Cityscape at dusk showcasing skyline with prominent skyscrapers under a vibrant sky, ideal for business news context.
  • Bank of England waters down stablecoin rules after industry backlash

    Regulation
    Bank of England deputy governor Breeden discusses economic policies during a press conference
  • The Bank of England is keeping Britain in the waiting room

    Opinion
    Andrew Bailey, Bank of England governor, discusses economic policy during a press conference at the central bank headquart...
  • Interest rates set to be held as inflation to remain ‘elevated’ despite Iran peace deal

    Economics
    For the first time in months, economists are unsure whether the Bank of England will cut interest rates.
  • Bank of England chief economist ‘not trying to be a troublemaker’ on rates split

    Economics
    Chief economist Huw Pill said "consistency" was key to the Bank of England's quantitative tightening programme (Photo by: Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
  • Bank of England should hold interest rates, City PM Shadow MPC says

    Economics
    Bailey Boe in professional attire speaking at a business conference with a presentation screen in the background.
  • Santander: Fans to spend thousands watching World Cup from Britain

    Sport Business
    Business professionals discussing strategy in a modern office setting with a cityscape view through large windows

City PM — European politics, business and analysis.

Europe

  • Germany
  • France
  • Europe
  • UK & Ireland

Topics

  • Business
  • Markets
  • AI
  • Technology
  • Opinion
  • Energy

More

  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Fintech
  • Legal
  • Sport
  • Life

Company

  • About City PM
  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
© 2026 City PM · Published by CityPM Media, Bahnhofstrasse 65, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland
About · Editorial Policy · Corrections · Contact · Privacy